Work in progress.
Not ready for study.

20  The propped-state resembling verb

20.1 Introduction

In chapter @ref(raised-state-resembling-verbs) we mentioned that resembling verbs have three states (like nouns). These states are called:

1. The raised-state
2. The propped-state
3. The clipped-state

We introduced the raised-state resembling verb in chapter @ref(raised-state-resembling-verbs). In this chapter we will study the propped-state resembling verb.

The raised-state resembling verb makes a plain statement. The propped-state resembling verb implies a wish or purpose. The propped-state resembling verb is used after the following articles:

• أَنْ ʾan
• لَنْ lan
• لِ li
• كَيْ kay
• حَتَّىٰ ḥattā
• إِذَنْ ʾid͡han

We will go over these cases in this chapter.

20.2 Forming the propped-state resembling verb

Here is the raised-state resembling verb for the singular masculine absentee participant doer “he”:

يَفْعَلُ
yafɛalu
“he does”

Note that, because it is in the raised-state, the its final letter ends with a ḍammah ◌ُ. In order to form the propped-state resembling verb, we change the ḍammah into a fat·ḥah ◌َ, thus:

يَفْعَلَ
yafɛala

This is done for all participants whose doer pronoun is invisible and raised-state verb ends with a ḍammah ◌ُ.

For participants whose doer pronoun is followed by an extra ن in the raised-state verb, this final ن is dropped in order to form the propped-state resembling verb. So, for example, the raised-state resembling verb:

يَفْعَلَانِ
yafɛalāni
“they_2,m do”

becomes, for the propped-state:

يَفْعَلَا
yafɛalā

Here is the complete table of the propped-state resembling verb for all doer participants.

Participant	Resembling verb doer pronoun	raised-state resembling verb	propped-state resembling verb
he	invisible	يَفْعَلُ	يَفْعَلَ
she	invisible	تَفْعَلُ	تَفْعَلَ
you1m	invisible	تَفْعَلُ	تَفْعَلَ
you1f	ي	تَفْعَلِينَ	تَفْعَلِي
I	invisible	أَفْعَلُ	أَفْعَلَ
they2m	ا	يَفْعَلَانِ	يَفْعَلَا
they2f	ا	تَفْعَلَانِ	تَفْعَلَا
you2	ا	تَفْعَلَانِ	تَفْعَلَا
they3m	و	يَفْعَلُونَ	يَفْعَلُوا
they3f	نَ	يَفْعَلْنَ	يَفْعَلْنَ (same)
you3m	و	تَفْعَلُونَ	تَفْعَلُوا
you3f	نَ	تَفْعَلْنَ	تَفْعَلْنَ (same)
we	invisible	نَفْعَلُ	نَفْعَلَ

Take note the following:

• The raised-state and propped-state verbs are the same for the feminine plural absentee and addressee participants:
  • يَفْعَلْنَ (they_3f)
  • تَفْعَلْنَ (you_3f)
• The propped-state verbs for the masculine plural absentee and addressee participants have a final silent alif:
  • يَفْعَلُوا (they_3m)
  • تَفْعَلُوا (you_3m)

20.3 After أَنْ ʾan

أَنْ ʾan “that” is the main article which causes the following resembling verb to be in the propped-state. The other articles that we listed in the introduction are all either derived from أَنْ or include its meaning implicitly without expressing it.

20.3.1 Basic usage of أَنْ ʾan with the propped-state resembling verb

أَنْ often follows verbs that have a meaning of wishing or hoping. For example,

أَمَلَ ٱلطَّالِبُ أَنْ يَنْجَحَ.
ʾamala -ṭṭālibu ʾan yanjaḥ.
“The student hoped that he succeed.”

لَا can be used to negate the following propped-state resembling verb. لَا combines with أَنْ and assimilates with it to form أَلَّا ʾallā “that not”. For example,

أَمَرَ ٱلْأَبُ ٱلِٱبْنَ أَلَّا يَكْسَلَ.
ʾamara -lʾabu li-bna ʾallā yaksal.
“The father ordered the son that he not be lazy.”

Other than this لَا, أَنْ must directly precede the following propped-state resembling verb and must not be separated from it.

20.3.2 Grammatical equivalence of أَنْ clause with a maṣdar

In grammatical theory, أَنْ and the following verb form a clause that is equivalent in meaning to the maṣdar of the verb. So in the example, أَمَلَ ٱلطَّالِبُ أَنْ يَنْجَحَ., the أَنْ clause is أَنْ يَنْجَحَ. It is equivalent to the maṣdar ٱلنَّجَاح. So the sentence is grammatically equivalent to

أَمَلَ ٱلطَّالِبُ ٱلنَّجَاحَ.
ʾamala -ṭṭālibu -nnajāḥ.
“The student hoped [for] success.”

This grammatical equivalence of the أَنْ clause with a noun aloows the أَنْ clause to take the place of a noun in various positions in a sentence. So, in the above example, the أَنْ clause is in place of the direct doee of the verb أَمَلَ:

We show other examples below where the أَنْ clause occurs in place of other noun positions.

As the subject:

which is grammatically equivalent to: نَجَاحَكَ هُوَ ٱلْمَقْصِدُ..

As the comment:

which is grammatically equivalent to: ٱَلْمَقْصِدُ نَجَاحَكَ..

As a doer noun:

which is grammatically equivalent to: يَحْزُنُنِي ذَهَابُهُ..

In the lowered-state as the base noun in an annexation:

which is grammatically equivalent to: سَكَتَتْ مِنْ خَشْيَةِ غَضَبِهِ عَلَيْهَا..

In the lowered-state after a preposition:

which is grammatically equivalent to: رَغِبَ ٱلْغُلَامُ فِي أَكْلِ ٱلطَّعَامِ..

20.3.3 Option to drop the preposition before أَنْ

In the above example the verb رَغِبَ يَرْغَبُ takes an indirect doee after the preposition فِي. In such cases, where the أَنْ clause occurs after a preposition, it is common to drop the preposition as long as there is not resulting confusion in meaning. So, we can also say (without the preposition فِي) for the same meaning:

رَغِبَ ٱلْغُلَامُ أَنْ يَأْكُلَ ٱلطَّعَامَ.
“The boy desired that he eat the food.”

20.3.4 أَنْ meaning “lest”

Ocassionally, أَنْ is used with the meaning “lest”. For example:

قَتَلْتُ ٱلثُّعْبَانَ أَنْ يَقْتُلَنِي.
“I killed the serpent lest it kill me.”

20.3.5 أَنْ with the past verb

أَنْ may also occur before a past verb. Example:

بَلَغَنِي أَنْ رَجَعْتَ.
“That you have returned has reached me.”

20.3.6 Other types of أَنْ

There are other types of أَنْ in the Arabic language. They all have the basic meaning “that”. But they are used in different grammatical ways.

The أَنْ we have learned here is called the maṣdari أَنْ because of the equivalence of its clause with a maṣdar.

There is also another type of أَنْ called the lightened أَنْ that we will learn in section @ref(lightened-an).

There is also the explanatory أَنْ and the extra أَنْ that we will cover in chapter @ref(types-of-an).

20.4 After لِ li

20.4.1 The لِ of purpose

The article أَنْ may be attached to the preposition لِ li thus: لِأَنْ liʾan to give the purpose of the following verb. This لِ may be translated as “so that”. For example:

أَكَلَ لِأَنْ يَشْبَعَ.
“He ate so that he be sated.”

When لِ is thus used, أَنْ is optionally allowed to be dropped while its meaning is retained. لِ is then attached to the verb. So we can say, for the same meaning:

أَكَلَ لِيَشْبَعَ.
“He ate so that he be sated.”

But when using لَا to negate the verb, then أَنْ must be expressed, and the combination of لِ, أَنْ, and لَا is written as لِئَلَّا liʾallā. For example,

شَرِبَ ٱلْمَاءَ لِئَلَّا يَعْطَشَ.
“He drank the water so that he not be thirsty.”

By the way, the grammatical equivalence of أَنْ and a following propped-state resembling verb with a maṣdar applies also to when لِ is used before (either an expressed or an implied) أَنْ. So, for example, if we have a sentence:

قَرَأَ ٱلْكِتَابَ لِيَعْلَمَ مَفْهُومَهُ.
or
قَرَأَ ٱلْكِتَابَ لِأَنْ يَعْلَمَ مَفْهُومَهُ.
“He read the book so that he know its meaning.”

Then, grammatically, أَنْ and what follows it may be expressed with the maṣdar عِلْم thus:

قَرَأَ ٱلْكِتَابَ لِعِلْمِ مَفْهُومِهِ.
“He read the book for the knowledge of its meaning.”

20.4.2 The لِ of denial

There is a specific لِ, called the لِ of denial, which is used with propped-state resembling verbs and the verb كَانَ that we will discuss in section (TODO in كَانَ chapter).

20.5 After كَيْ kay

كَيْ kay is a preposition similar to لِ in meaning. It may be translated as “in order that”, or also as “so that”. It is also used before the propped-state resembling verb. The difference from لِ is that, when لِ is used with the propped-state resembling verb, expressing or dropping the أَنْ was optional. But with كَيْ, dropping the أَنْ is mandatory, while its meaning is retained. For example:

أَكَلَ كَيْ يَشْبَعَ.
“He ate in order that he be sated.”

لَا is used, as usual, to negate the verb and is attached to كَيْ thus: كَيْلَا kaylā. Example:

شَرِبَ ٱلْمَاءَ كَيْلَا يَعْطَشَ.
“He drank the water in order that he not be thirsty.”

The preposition لِ may be combined with كَيْ thus: لِكَيْ likay, for more or less the same meaning. For example:

أَكَلَ لِكَيْ يَشْبَعَ.
“He ate in order that he be sated.”

With لَا the whole combination is written as لِكَيْلَا likaylā. أَنْ must again be not be expressed.

Example:

شَرِبَ ٱلْمَاءَ لِكَيْلَا يَعْطَشَ.
“He drank the water in order that he not be thirsty.”

By the way, كَيْ and a following propped-state resembling verb are not directly replaced by a maṣdar. So, for example, if we have a sentence:

قَرَأَ ٱلْكِتَابَ كَيْ يَعْلَمَ مَفْهُومَهُ.
“He read the book in order that he know its meaning.”

Then لِ is to be used in place of كَيْ if we wish to replace it and what follows with the maṣdar عِلْم thus:

قَرَأَ ٱلْكِتَابَ لِعِلْمِ مَفْهُومِهِ.
“He read the book for the knowledge of its meaning.”

20.6 After حَتَّىٰ ḥattā

حَتَّىٰ ḥattā is a particle that can be used in multiple ways. Its basic meaning is “until” or “to the point of” or “even” where it indicates an extreme limit.

Before we discuss its use with a verb following it, we will take a short digression to discuss its use with a following noun.

20.6.1 حَتَّىٰ ḥattā with a following noun

Consider the following sentence:

أَكَلْتُ ٱلسَّمَكَةَ حَتَّىٰ رَأْسِهَا.
“I ate the fish until its head.”

حَتَّىٰ “until”, here, is used as a preposition. Therefore, رَأْس is in the lowered-state, as the noun following a preposition. The meaning of the sentence is that the fish was eaten all the way to its head. (Whether the head itself was eaten or not is ambiguous. The sentence itself admits both meanings.)

Consider now a variant of this sentence:

أَكَلْتُ ٱلسَّمَكَةَ حَتَّىٰ رَأْسَهَا.
“I ate the fish, even its head.”

رَأْس, here, is in the propped-state because it is a direct doee of the verb أَكَلَ “ate”. The particle حَتَّىٰ “even”, here, is only a connector between the direct doees in much the same way as وَ “and”. (أَكَلْتُ ٱلسَّمَكَةَ وَرَأْسَهَا. “I ate the fish and its head.”)

Consider now yet another variant of this sentence:

أَكَلْتُ ٱلسَّمَكَةَ. حَتَّىٰ رَأْسُهَا [أَكَلْتُهَا].
“I ate the fish. Even its head [I ate].”

Now رَأْس is in the raised-state because it is actually the subject of a new sentence, whose comment is (an either expressed or implied) أَكَلْتُهَا “I ate it”. حَتَّىٰ, here, serves as an introductory particle to the second subject and does not affect the state of the following noun.

20.6.2 حَتَّىٰ ḥattā with a following verb

Just as حَتَّىٰ is used for different purposes with a following noun, so too is it used with different purposes with a verb following it.

20.6.2.1 حَتَّىٰ with a following propped-state resembling verb

When حَتَّىٰ is used with an expectation or purpose of a future action of the verb following it, then the verb following it is an propped-state resembling verb. This is done in the following two scenarios:

1. When حَتَّىٰ is used to indicate an extreme point at which the action of the following verb would occur, or is meant to occur. Here, حَتَّىٰ may be translated as “to the point of” and the verb following it is translated using “-ing”. For example,

   قَرَأْتُ ٱلْقُرْآنَ حَتَّىٰ أَخْتِمَهُ.
   “I read the Qurʾān to the point of finishing it.”

   يَغْضَبُ حَتَّىٰ يَهْرَبُوا مِنْهُ.
   “He becomes angry to the point of their fleeing from him.”

   غَضِبَ حَتَّىٰ لَا يَمْلِكَ نَفْسَهُ.
   “He became angry to the point of not controlling himself.”

   It is noteworthy that the use of حَتَّىٰ, here, implies only that the following action is meant to occur, or is at the point of being expected to occur. It doesn’t actually state that the action will actually occur, for something may prevent it from occurring in reality.¹

   Note, also, that لَا is not attached to حَتَّىٰ in حَتَّىٰ لَا.

   Also, similar to the case of كَيْ, there is an assumed (but mandatorily unexpressed) أَنْ which is the real cause of the following resembling verb being in the propped-state. In fact, حَتَّىٰ, here, can be considered synonymous to إِلَىٰ أَنْ “to [the point] that”. So the above examples can be considered similar in meaning to:

   قَرَأْتُ ٱلْقُرْآنَ إِلَىٰ أَنْ أَخْتِمَهُ.

   يَغْضَبُ إِلَىٰ أَنْ يَهْرَبُوا مِنْهُ.

   غَضِبَ إِلَىٰ أَلَّا يَمْلِكَ نَفْسَهُ.

2. When حَتَّىٰ is used with the meaning “to such a purpose that”. This is a similar meaning to كَيْ “in order that”. For example,

   أَذْهَبُ إِلَيْهِ حَتَّىٰ يَأْمُرَنِي بِشَيْءٍ.
   “I go to him to such a purpose that he order me [to do] something.”

   وَعَظَ ٱلْأَبُ ٱبْنَهُ حَتَّىٰ يَصْلُحَ.
   “The father admonished his son to such a purpose that he be righteous.”

   Again, there is an assumed (but mandatorily unexpressed) أَنْ which is the real cause of the following resembling verb being in the propped-state.

Sometimes, the sentence itself may admit both of the above meanings. For example:

يَأْكُلُ حَتَّىٰ يَشْبَعَ.
“He eats to the point of being full.”
and/or
“He eats to the purpose that he be full.”

Context would be needed to determine which meaning or whether both meanings are intended.

20.6.2.2 حَتَّىٰ with no effect on the following verb

If حَتَّىٰ is not used with any expectation or purpose of a future action of the verb following it, then it has no effect on this verb. (It goes without saying that an implicit أَنْ is not assumed with حَتَّىٰ in this case.)

The verb following حَتَّىٰ in this case may even be a past verb. For example:

أَكَلْتُ ٱلطَّعَامَ حَتَّىٰ شَبِعْتُ.
“I ate the food until I became full.”

When used with a following resembling verb, the verb is put in the raised-state and the meaning is that the action of the verb before حَتَّىٰ was done to such an extent that it caused the action of the verb following حَتَّىٰ to definitely occur. The action before حَتَّىٰ must necessarily be a past action, and the action following حَتَّىٰ must necessarily be a present (not a future) action. For example,

أَكَلْتُ ٱلطَّعَامَ حَتَّىٰ أَشْبَعُ.
“I ate the food to such an extent that I am (being) full.”

غَضِبَ حَتَّىٰ يَهْرَبُونَ مِنْهُ.
“He became so angry that they are fleeing from him.”

غَضِبَ حَتَّىٰ لَا يَمْلِكُ نَفْسَهُ.
“He became so angry that he is not controlling himself.”

Compare these examples with the corresponding ones in the previous sub-section that have an propped-state resembling verb.

20.7 After لَنْ lan

لَا and أَنْ are combined to form لَنْ lan with the meaning “shall not”. لَنْ is used with the propped-state resembling verb to emphatically negate the future.

لَنْ تَذْهَبَ.
“You_1m shall not go.”

20.8 After إِذَنْ ʾid͡han

TODO

20.9 After وَ, فَ, أَوْ, and ثُمَّ

20.9.1 As connectors

If the connectors وَ, فَ, أَوْ, and ثُمَّ occur after an propped-state resembling verb, then a second propped-state resembling verb (that doesn’t have its own أَنْ, etc.) may be either in the propped-state or the raised-state. For example,

أَرْغَبُ أَنْ أَحْضُرَ ٱلْمَجْلِسَ وَأَسْمَعَ. (أَسْمَعَ in propped-state)
“I desire that I attend the session and [that] I listen.”

or

أَرْغَبُ أَنْ أَحْضُرَ ٱلْمَجْلِسَ وَأَسْمَعُ. (أَسْمَعَ in raised-state)
“I desire that I attend the session and I will listen.”

20.9.2 With special meanings

وَ, فَ, أَوْ, and ثُمَّ also cause the following resembling verb to be in the propped-state in their own right, not simply as connectors. This is discussed in more detail in chapter TODO.

---

1. Sadan, A., The subjunctive mood in Arabic grammatical thought 201